Authors
MUDr, MD, MRCS-RCPhSG, FRCS (CTh) Eng., Department of Thoracic surgery. St James’s University Hospitals Leeds, UK
[email protected] & [email protected]
BDS, GDS, Resident Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Al-Farabi University Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
PhD, FRCS (CTh) Eng., Department of Surgery, Imperial Collage London, UK
Abstract
Background: Over the last 30 years, oesophageal surgery amongst thoracic surgeons has reduced by 80%, and forms less than 1% of current thoracic practice. Oesophageal perforation has a high morbidity, and mortality rates can be as high as 30% if not treated. There are currently no guidelines regarding referral for the management of oesophageal perforation in the UK.
Methods: We designed an online survey to ascertain the current expert opinion on the management of oesophageal perforation, which was validated and approved by the society of cardiothoracic surgery of Great Britan and Ireland- SCTS. This was sent to all consultant thoracic (N=77) and cardiothoracic (N=85) surgeons identified in the SCTS registry. In total, 49 responses were received from a variety of UK regions.
Results: Many responses indicated that emergency cover for oesophageal perforation came exclusively from the upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgeons (50%) compared to thoracic surgeons (18%). Only 37% agreed they would manage the patients themselves and a similar number were comfortable to operate alone. 46% of believed the service should be taken over exclusively by the UGI surgeons.
With regards to surgical experience: 55% agreed they could comfortably deal with complex cases, which correlated with having >16 years experience. Only 25% of consultants with 1-5 years experience felt confident to manage the condition alone.
With regards to previous training, 100% of consultants who trained >16 years ago believed they had sufficient exposure to oesophageal surgery as a trainee, compared to 50-70% for those trained <16 years ago. Only 2% believed current trainees receive sufficient exposure to oesophageal perforation nationwide, and 28% believed oesophageal surgery should be taken off the training curriculum.
Conclusion: The present study finds much heterogeneity in the way oesophageal perforation is managed nationally. The willingness of thoracic surgeons to manage the oesophagus correlates with prior exposure. We believe this has important implications for current training and a national consensus for future direction is required.